Make Texture a preferred source on Google to support us
Add Texture to GoogleA finger swiping through a TikTok video, a quick search on a browser, a visit to a store to check the weight of a fabric, and a final transaction completed silently on a smartphone at midnight. From the perspective of the modern shopper, this journey is a single, natural, uninterrupted flow. At the headquarters of major retailers, however, this fragmented journey has been the ultimate headache for the past twenty years. The challenge is no longer simply to sell, but to maintain narrative integrity across a constellation of unpredictable touchpoints. Jalil Rahman is observing this tectonic shift in consumer behavior very closely. The former executive, who has held top positions at historic brands such as Burberry and Liberty, recently shared with The Retail Bulletin his perspective on the dynamics shaping the luxury retail sector. Far from blindly embracing technological innovation, he advocates an approach where psychology dictates usage—not the other way around.
The Sedimentation of Heritage
The starting point for his thinking, in fact, is not rooted in the product itself, but in the invisible mechanisms of decision-making. Even before developing global strategies, Jalil Rahman envisioned a career in advertising, driven by a singular obsession: understanding the factors that lead an individual to choose one object over another. Ultimately, it was the complexity of the fashion industry that captured his attention, offering him a playground where a brand’s survival hinges on a precarious balance between creative aspirations, profitability imperatives, and an intimate understanding of the customer.
His years at Burberry crystallized this vision. There, he witnessed firsthand a delicate process: the expansion of a British heritage institution into new geographic territories and product categories. How can one extend the reach of a historic house without tearing apart its foundational fabric? This question has become the driving force behind his professional approach. Geographic or financial growth only makes sense if it preserves the essence that initially fostered customer loyalty. Altering a brand’s DNA to force its acceptance in a new market ultimately amounts to destroying its most valuable asset.
The Mirage of Cultural Turmoil
Today, a luxury brand’s competitor is no longer necessarily the storefront across the street. The battlefield has expanded considerably. Jalil Rahman lucidly points out that the industry now competes with sectors entirely unrelated to fashion. A portion of a customer’s discretionary budget may just as easily be directed toward a gastronomic experience, a trip to a faraway destination, or the purchase of a work of art. Faced with this dilution of attention, the urgent task for senior management is to weave what he calls a “golden thread.” Every interaction—whether digital or in-person—must bring the consumer back to the brand’s center of gravity.
This need for consistency, however, clashes with a constant temptation in the industry: the race for cultural relevance. The fear of becoming obsolete drives many brands to match their pace to the frenetic rhythm of fleeting trends. Jalil Rahman warns against this reflex to over-adapt. Seeking to reinvent one’s narrative with every societal or aesthetic shift is the surest path to alienating one’s long-standing customer base. While distribution channels and communication platforms require constant modernization, the brand’s core identity must offer resilience—a reassuring sense of permanence. Shoppers are looking for consistency and a clear stance—not a distorted mirror of the times.
The Anatomy of a Meaningful Partnership
This demand for authenticity finds its direct extension in the way brands approach their external partnerships. The industry has ramped up collaborations at an industrial pace, ultimately creating a sense of weariness. According to Jalil Rahman, the failure of most of these initiatives stems from a flawed initial premise. Too many companies view partnerships as mere visibility boosters or immediate revenue drivers, failing to assess whether they actually create a mutual competitive advantage.
The public’s eye has become more discerning. Opportunistic alliances, where two logos coexist without any intellectual or functional justification, quickly breed cynicism. A partnership takes root only if it manages to tell a logical story, weaving an unexpected yet obvious connection between complementary areas of expertise. Its collaboration with the London department store Liberty provides a clear illustration of this. At first glance, pairing this temple of floral prints and British craftsmanship with a tech giant to promote the Microsoft Surface Pro seemed like a stretch. Yet the campaign worked because it revolved around a shared purpose: providing tools to foster creativity. The partnership made sense in terms of practical applications.
But building a partnership goes beyond agreements in principle. Jalil Rahman points to a systemic flaw in managing these projects: team burnout by the time the deal is signed. After months of arduous negotiations, attention often wanes at the very moment it should be intensifying. The ink on the contract is not a finish line. That is exactly where the operational execution begins—collaborative design, distribution logistics, marketing targeting—which will determine the partnership’s viability on the ground.
Clarity as the Sole Authority
Putting these complex strategies into action requires specific management software. When asked about his definition of corporate leadership, Jalil Rahman distances himself from the traditional figure of the providential and omniscient boss—a myth he admits to having observed with fascination early in his career. Over the years, his conception of authority has shed its artifice to focus on a single principle: clarity. Knowing how to articulate a precise intention, set unambiguous expectations, and maintain transparent communication.
In practice, this approach requires setting aside one’s own ego in favor of active listening. When taking on a new role, his first instinct is to map out the company from the ground up, cross-referencing feedback from the financial, creative, operational, and sales departments. This cross-functional curiosity allows him to formulate a strategic direction that, far from being detached from reality, incorporates the actual constraints on the ground.
This model is based on the decentralization of trust. While he demands relentless excellence in results, he rejects micromanagement. Highly specialized professionals stifle under excessive control; they perform at their best when guaranteed the autonomy needed to manage their own projects. Rahman thus demonstrates that business rigor does not preclude empathy. Maintaining a functional level of pressure while ensuring that teams feel supported is not a contradiction, but rather the prerequisite for sustainable performance. The evaluation of mistakes—which is essential—must serve as a lever for technical progress, not as a tool for personal demotion.
Beyond the analysis of purchasing algorithms and growth curves, the former executive’s perspective consistently brings the mechanics of business back to a profoundly human issue. At a time when the industry sometimes exhausts itself chasing digital pipe dreams, his call to order rings true: technological adaptation is a vital necessity, but it will never save a company that has forgotten why people wanted it in the first place.